content image

人間の著作者なくして、著作権なし:最高裁、AI創作アートに関する重要判決を支持

No Human Author, No Copyright: The Supreme Court Lets Stand a Key Ruling on AI-Created Art

AIが生成した作品に著作権は認められるのか。米最高裁の判断により、著作権には人間の創造性が不可欠とする立場が明確になった。
分からないところをタップすると
↓日本語訳が表示されます↓

If an AI system writes a poem or creates a picture, can that work have copyright? In the United States, the answer is becoming clearer: copyright still starts with human creativity. On March 2, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Stephen Thaler’s appeal in Thaler v. Perlmutter, so a March 18, 2025 decision by the D.C. Circuit remains in force. That lower court said the Copyright Act requires a work to be authored by a human being. Thaler had tried to register an image called A Recent Entrance to Paradise while naming his “Creativity Machine” as the only author and describing the image as autonomously generated by the machine. (supremecourt.gov)

The court’s logic was practical, not science-fictional. It explained that many parts of copyright law make sense only if an author is human. Copyright first belongs to the author, often lasts for the author’s life plus seventy years, and can pass to family members after death. Machines do not own property, have a lifespan in the legal sense, or leave heirs behind. Still, the judges were careful to say that AI-assisted art is not automatically excluded. The real question is whether a human shaped the expressive parts of the final work, rather than simply asking a machine to produce something on its own. (copyright.gov)

The U.S. Copyright Office has drawn almost the same line. In its March 16, 2023 registration guidance and its January 29, 2025 AI report, the Office said purely AI-generated material is not protected, and prompts by themselves usually do not give enough control over the final expression. However, copyright can still cover the human contribution: a person’s own text or images inside the output, a creative selection or arrangement of AI-generated material, or meaningful edits and modifications. After reviewing more than 10,000 public comments, the Office concluded that existing law is flexible enough and that no new special copyright for AI outputs is currently needed. In short, U.S. law is not rejecting AI as a tool; it is insisting that copyright rewards human originality. (copyright.gov)

by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 21:02
レベル:中上級 (語彙目安:4000〜6000語)

まだ読んでいないコンテンツ

content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/27 03:04
レベル:中級 (語彙目安:2000〜2500語)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/27 03:03
レベル:初中級 (語彙目安:1000〜2000語)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/27 03:01
レベル:超上級 (語彙目安:8000語以上)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 21:04
レベル:上級 (語彙目安:6000〜8000語)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 21:01
レベル:超入門 (語彙目安:〜300語)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 15:04
レベル:初級 (語彙目安:300〜1000語)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 15:03
レベル:中級 (語彙目安:2000〜2500語)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 15:01
レベル:初中級 (語彙目安:1000〜2000語)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 09:06
レベル:超上級 (語彙目安:8000語以上)
content image
by EigoBoxAI
作成:2026/03/26 09:03
レベル:上級 (語彙目安:6000〜8000語)